翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Hartsook, California
・ Hartsop
・ Hartsop above How
・ Hartsop Dodd
・ Hartstein
・ Hartstene Bay
・ Hartstonge
・ Hartstonge baronets
・ Hartstown, Pennsylvania
・ Hartsuiker
・ Hartsville
・ Hartsville Armory
・ Hartsville Community Center-Hartsville Community Market
・ Hartsville High School
・ Hartsville Nuclear Plant
Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States
・ Hartsville Passenger Station
・ Hartsville Post Office
・ Hartsville Railroad
・ Hartsville Regional Airport
・ Hartsville, Indiana
・ Hartsville, New York
・ Hartsville, South Carolina
・ Hartsville, Tennessee
・ Hartswater
・ Hartswood Films
・ Hartt
・ Hartt Wixom
・ Harttia
・ Harttia carvalhoi


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States : ウィキペディア英語版
Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States

''Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States'' , is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the jurisdiction of the Court of Claims was not enlarged by Congressional reference legislation when the court already had jurisdiction to hear the case under another section of the Judicial Code.〔''Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States'', .〕 Additionally the court held that modification to the contract in question was not by duress as there had not been an inadequate power in the courts to remedy the effects of the threatened actions.〔''Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States'', .〕
==Background==
On September 26, 1918, the government made a contract with Hartsville Oil Mill, a cottonseed producer, which was replicated with several other cottonseed producers for the delivery of cotton linters.〔''Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States'', .〕 Cotton linters, a by-product of the cotton crushing process, were used by the government in World War I for the production of explosives. Of the production of 2,250,000 pounds, 270,000 bales were on hand and inspected when armistice was declared in late 1918. At this time the government informed the producers that it intended to cancel the contract and would only accept 150,000 bales if the producers agreed to a contract modification.〔Chang, Betty, ''Coercion Theory and the State Action Doctrine as Applied in NCAA v. Tarkanian and NCAA v. Miller,'' 22 J.C. & U.L. 133, 159 (1995).〕 Faced with this repudiation of the contract, the producers agreed to the modification and sought recovery by petition to the U.S. Senate under Judicial Code § 145, the predecessor to 28 U.S.C. § 1492.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Hartsville Oil Mill v. United States」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.